Vulcan Centaur vs Falcon 9

Vulcan Centaur replaced Atlas V and Delta IV to keep United Launch Alliance competitive for US national security launches, the market where reliability and unusual orbits matter more than price. It buys its BE-4 engines from Blue Origin and pairs them with the long-lived Centaur upper stage.

Key differences

  • Reuse: Vulcan is expendable (engine-recovery concepts remain paper studies); Falcon 9 reuses boosters as standard.
  • Specialty: Vulcan's Centaur V upper stage excels at long-coast, direct-to-GEO national security profiles that Falcon 9 typically serves with an expendable core.
  • Flight record: Vulcan had flown 4 times by mid-2026, with a booster nozzle anomaly in February 2026 pausing Space Force missions; Falcon 9 flies near-daily.
  • Engines: Vulcan burns liquefied natural gas in two BE-4s plus optional solid boosters; Falcon 9 uses nine kerosene Merlins.

Side-by-side specifications

Vulcan CentaurFalcon 9
ManufacturerUnited Launch AllianceSpaceX
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
First flightJanuary 8, 2024June 4, 2010
Height61.6 m70 m
Diameter5.4 m3.7 m
MassUp to 546,700 kg (VC6)549,054 kg
Payload to LEO27,200 kg (VC6)22,800 kg (expendable)
Stages2, plus 0-6 solid boosters2
StatusActive (launches paused pending booster investigation)Active
Total launches4 (as of June 2026)670 (Falcon family, as of June 29, 2026)

Figures come from each article's infobox; see the articles for sources and context.

More comparisons