Apollo vs Artemis

Apollo was a Cold War sprint: land first, whatever the cost. Artemis is built to stay, with commercial landers, international partners, and the lunar south pole's water ice as the destination. The contrast shows in nearly every architectural choice.

Key differences

  • Goal: Apollo aimed to beat the Soviet Union to the surface; Artemis aims for a sustained presence and a proving ground for Mars.
  • Architecture: Apollo flew everything on one Saturn V; Artemis splits the job between SLS/Orion for crew transit and commercial landers (Starship HLS, Blue Moon) for the surface.
  • Destination: Apollo landed near the equator in daylight; Artemis targets the south pole, where permanently shadowed craters hold water ice.
  • Pace and budget: Apollo consumed about 4 percent of the federal budget at its peak and put 12 people on the Moon in 41 months; Artemis has flown two missions since 2022, with the first landing planned for Artemis IV in 2028.

Side-by-side specifications

Apollo programArtemis program
OperatorNASANASA with international and commercial partners
Program duration1961-1972-
Launch vehiclesSaturn V, Saturn IB-
First crewed flightApollo 7, October 11, 1968-
First lunar landingApollo 11, July 20, 1969-
Crewed lunar landings6-
Moonwalkers12-
Samples returned382 kg (842 lb)-
Cost$25.8 billion (1960-1973), about $309 billion in 2025 dollars-
Started-2017
Goal-Sustained human exploration of the Moon, then Mars
Rocket-Space Launch System
Spacecraft-Orion (with ESA service module)
Landers-Starship HLS, Blue Moon MK2
Flights so far-Artemis I (2022, uncrewed), Artemis II (2026, crewed flyby)
Next mission-Artemis III, Earth-orbit docking tests (2027)

Figures come from each article's infobox; see the articles for sources and context.